Ten-minute AI judgement checks: three quick formative tasks for P4-P6

• StageP4-P6
• SubjectCross-curricular
• Learning strandreflection on the application of AI
• Official documentsAI Literacy Learning Framework for Primary and Secondary Schools · Guide to Using AI in Teaching in Primary and Secondary Schools
• Session timeOne lesson (60 min)

Three short formative tasks (about ten minutes each): judge whether an AI answer is trustworthy, spot the part of a classmate's answer the writer can actually defend, and list what still needs checking before handing work in. With scoring guidance and follow-up activities.

• AudienceTeachers Students
• ThemeStudent thinking

• EquipmentPrinted worksheets only; a projector helps if you model a task
• Version2.5
• Last updated2026-10-18

What this solves

After pupils use AI for homework, the hardest thing for a teacher to see is often not whether the answer is right, but whether the pupil actually thought about it. Reading through a chat history is neither practical nor good for privacy.

These three short tasks (about ten minutes each) let a teacher see pupils’ judgement without uploading any pupil work or reading a chat history:

1. Can they judge, sentence by sentence, which parts of an AI answer are trustworthy and which are doubtful?
2. Can they spot which part of a classmate’s answer the writer actually understands and can explain?
3. Do they know what still needs checking before a piece of work is handed in?

Each task comes with a simple scoring guide (strong / developing / needs help) and a follow-up activity, and fits any subject: a teacher only swaps in a short AI answer, a classmate’s answer, or a piece of draft work from their own subject.

The three tasks can form part of a school’s digital education planning and be used in any subject as a short assessment of judgement: pupils decide which claims are AI hallucinations, practise verifying and fact-checking them, and write down what they still need to question.

Learning objectives

By the end, pupils can:

1. Judge sentence by sentence which claims in an AI answer are trustworthy, and say what evidence is missing.
2. Tell which parts of an answer the writer could explain in their own words, and which parts look copied.
3. List what to check before handing in work (sources, facts, can-I-explain-it), not just spelling and layout.

They cover the reflection on the application of AI strand of AI literacy and build critical thinking about timely and appropriate use and human judgement first.

How to use it

One 60-minute lesson, in four segments.

1. Introduction and Task 1: trustworthy or not? (15 min) — Set the goal: “We are not judging whether AI was used; we are learning to judge.” Agree the ground rule: these tasks do not grade whether a pupil used AI. Hand out the sheet. Pupils circle the claims they trust and the ones they doubt, and write what evidence is missing.
2. Task 2: what can you defend? (20 min) — Pupils underline the part of a classmate’s answer that the writer could explain in their own words, and write one sentence saying why.
3. Task 3: ready to hand in? (18 min) — Pupils read a draft piece of work and list what to check before handing it in.
4. Wrap-up and follow-up (7 min) — Choose one follow-up activity (below) and collect the answers as evidence for what to teach next.

Answer key and marking notes

All three tasks are open-ended, but good answers share checkable features. The examples below are fictional; teachers can swap in content from their own subject.

Task 1: Trustworthy or not?

Fictional example (an AI answer): “Drinking more water is good for you and can make you smarter. Many studies say water is important, so you should always drink eight glasses a day.”

Follow-up: sort the class’s “missing evidence” into three kinds — source, data, example — and post them as a classroom poster.

Task 2: What can you defend?

Fictional example (a classmate’s answer): “We should recycle rubbish because it keeps the earth less dirty. In addition, through systematic waste separation and resource recovery, we can effectively reduce the burden on landfills.”

Follow-up: pupils take out their last piece of work and circle the parts they can explain in their own words, practising defending their own answer.

Task 3: Ready to hand in?

Fictional example (a draft): “Dinosaurs died out about 66 million years ago. Some scientists say a large asteroid hitting the earth may have caused it. I think this theory is cool, so it must be right.”

Follow-up: merge the individual checklists into one shared “before-you-hand-in” checklist and post it in the classroom.

What not to grade

Do not grade whether a pupil used AI. These tasks score judgement — spotting missing evidence, defending understanding, planning a check — not the tool a pupil used. Using AI is not a fault here; the point is to see where the pupil’s thinking stops and what to teach next.

Files

Three printable worksheets (with the stimulus, space to write, the scoring guide and the answer notes) are in the download file:

Worksheet(editable Word document)

All examples are fictional and do not involve any real pupils or schools.

Official documents

Every resource in this library is written to the AI Literacy Learning Framework for Primary and Secondary Schools and falls within the policy scope of the Blueprint for Digital Education Development in Primary and Secondary Schools.

This resource maps to:

• Supplement I: AI Literacy Learning Framework for Primary and Secondary Schools (p.1-13): calls for varied, authentic assessment that covers application, ethics and thinking processes, rather than memorising the final answer alone.
• Supplement II: Guide to Using AI in Teaching in Primary and Secondary Schools (pp.2-7 to 2-8): recommends checking pupils’ learning and AI use through oral questioning and the submission of thinking processes, rather than collecting finished work alone.

Learning strand: reflection on the application of AI

Official documents page: https://www.edb.gov.hk/en/edu-system/primary-secondary/applicable-to-primary-secondary/it-in-edu/debp.html

This page is an independent Beets teaching resource, not an official EDB document.

Feedback

If you have any comments or questions about this resource, or an idea for the next one, tell us on the feedback page.