One-term AI education plan
BEETS AI · Theme A · Resource #1 · v0.1 (draft) · School planning · P1-S3
⚠️ All examples on this page are fictional and do not refer to any real school or person.
This file is a draft and must be reviewed by an educator before publication.
How to use
- Fill the blank planning table with this term's two pilot activities.
- For each activity, fill in the owner, dates and review evidence.
- Check that the plan is executable using the leader's checklist.
- When done, turn the page to compare with the fictional school's completed example.
Blank planning table
| Pilot activity |
Owner |
Dates / week |
Review evidence (what to look at afterwards) |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
Leader's checklist
□ Two pilot activities chosen, achievable within one term
□ Every activity has an owner (a named person or post)
□ Every activity has a date or week
□ Every activity states its review evidence — what to look at afterwards
□ Each activity can be tied to the EDB framework (B p.2 or F pp.1-6 to 1-10)
□ Mid-term and end-of-term review meetings have dates and an agenda
□ It is confirmed who collects and keeps the evidence
Completed example (fictional school)
The plan below is for a fictional primary school over one term (about 12 weeks), shown for illustration only.
The owner names and dates are fictional.
| Pilot activity |
Owner |
Dates / week |
Review evidence (what to look at afterwards) |
| 1. Whole-school staff workshop: understand the AI literacy framework and the school's direction |
Ms Chan, curriculum coordinator |
Week 2 (90 min) |
Attendance record, post-session questionnaire, a first draft of the school's AI-use agreement |
| 2. Cross-subject pilot lesson: one P5 General Studies period on "checking an AI answer" |
Mr Lee, General Studies panel head, with the P5 teachers |
Weeks 5-7 (one period per class) |
Three anonymised pupil worksheets + a panel review note |
| 3. Mid-term and end-of-term review |
Ms Chan, curriculum coordinator |
Weeks 6 and 12 |
Evidence folder + a decision on next term's scope |
The key judgement: the review-evidence column is what matters. If you cannot say
"what we will look at afterwards", the activity cannot be reviewed, which means it has not really been planned.
How this relates to the EDB framework
Maps to B (the Blueprint for Digital Education Development in Primary and Secondary Schools (three-fold leaflet), p.2): digital and AI education strategies
in school development plans with a clear implementation timetable; and
F (the AI Literacy Learning Framework for Primary and Secondary Schools, pp.1-6 to 1-10): cross-subject implementation
and progression across four learning stages.
This page is a teaching resource independently produced by Beets and is not an official EDB document.